Optimized prime editing in monocot plants using PlantPegDesigner and engineered plant prime editors (ePPEs)

Shuai Jin, Qiang Gao, Caixia Gao, Qiupeng Lin

Published: 2022-11-24 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-022-00773-9

Prime Editing

PlantPegDesigner

Engineered PEs

Monocot Plants

Optimized pegRNAs

AI 解读

Extended

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–3 and Notes 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Using high-resolution microscopy data to generate realistic structures for electromagnetic FDTD simulations from complex biological models

Experimental modulation of physiological force application on leg joint neurons in intactDrosophila melanogaster

Mitochondrial single-cell ATAC-seq for high-throughput multi-omic detection of mitochondrial genotypes and chromatin accessibility

Identification, isolation and analysis of human gut-associated lymphoid tissues

Development of RNA G-quadruplex (rG4)-targetingl-RNA aptamers by rG4-SELEX

Self-assembled ultraflexible probes for long-term neural recordings and neuromodulation

Hyperpolarized water as universal sensitivity booster in biomolecular NMR

Improved sampling and DNA extraction procedures for microbiome analysis in food-processing environments

An analytical workflow for dynamic characterization and quantification of metal-bearing nanomaterials in biological matrices

A flow cytometry-based protocol for syngenic isolation of neurovascular unit cells from mouse and human tissues

查看全部

Sections

Figures

References

Extended
Supplementary information

Gao, C. Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell 184, 1621–1635 (2021).
Li, Y., Li, W. & Li, J. The CRISPR/Cas9 revolution continues: from base editing to prime editing in plant science. J. Genet. Genomics 48, 661–670 (2021).
Li, G., Liu, Y. G. & Chen, Y. Genome-editing technologies: the gap between application and policy. Sci. China Life Sci. 62, 1534–1538 (2019).
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Lin, Q. et al. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 582–585 (2020).
Yang, L., Yang, B. & Chen, J. One prime for all editing. Cell 179, 1448–1450 (2019).
Jin, S. et al. Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1292–1299 (2021).
Gao, R. et al. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of prime editing guide RNA-independent off-target effects by prime editors. CRISPR J. 5, 276–293 (2022).
Kim, D. Y., Moon, S. B., Ko, J. H., Kim, Y. S. & Kim, D. Unbiased investigation of specificities of prime editing systems in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 10576–10589 (2020).
Zong, Y. et al. An engineered prime editor with enhanced editing efficiency in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01254-w (2022).
Song, M. et al. Generation of a more efficient prime editor 2 by addition of the Rad51 DNA-binding domain. Nat. Commun. 12, 5617 (2021).
Park, S. J. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in mouse cells and embryos using an enhanced prime editor. Genome Biol. 22, 170 (2021).
Liu, P. et al. Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2121 (2021).
Velimirovic, M. et al. Peptide fusion improves prime editing efficiency. Nat. Commun. 13, 3512 (2022).
Jiang, Y. et al. Prime editing efficiently generates W542L and S621I double mutations in two ALS genes of maize. Genome Biol. 21, 257 (2020).
Liu, Y. et al. Enhancing prime editing by Csy4-mediated processing of pegRNA. Cell Res. 31, 1134–1136 (2021).
Nelson, J. W. et al. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 402–410 (2022).
Chai, Y. et al. MS2 RNA aptamer enhances prime editing in rice. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.20.465209 (2021).
Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 5635–5652.e29 (2021).
Ferreira da Silva, J. F. et al. Prime editing efficiency and fidelity are enhanced in the absence of mismatch repair. Nat. Commun. 13, 760 (2022).
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Programmable large DNA deletion, replacement, integration, and inversion with twin prime editing and site-specific recombinases. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 731–740 (2021).
Ioannidi, E. I. et al. Drag-and-drop genome insertion without DNA cleavage with CRISPR-directed integrases. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.01.466786 (2021).
Kim, H. K. et al. Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 198–206 (2020).
Liu, Y. et al. Efficient generation of mouse models with the prime editing system. Cell Discov. 6, 27 (2020).
Lin, Q. et al. High-efficiency prime editing with optimized, paired pegRNAs in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 923–927 (2021).
Standage-Beier, K., Tekel, S. J., Brafman, D. A. & Wang, X. Prime editing guide RNA design automation using PINE-CONE. ACS Synth. Biol. 10, 422–427 (2021).
Bhagwat, A. M. et al. Multicrispr: gRNA design for prime editing and parallel targeting of thousands of targets. Life Sci. Alliance 3, e202000757 (2020).
Chow, R. D., Chen, J. S., Shen, J. & Chen, S. A web tool for the design of prime-editing guide RNAs. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 190–194 (2020).
Hsu, J. Y. et al. PrimeDesign software for rapid and simplified design of prime editing guide RNAs. Nat. Commun. 12, 1034 (2021).
Morris, J.A., Rahman, J.A., Guo, X. & Sanjana, N.E. Automated design of CRISPR prime editors for 56,000 human pathogenic variants. iScience 24, 103380 (2021).
Siegner, S. M., Karasu, M. E., Schröder, M. S., Kontarakis, Z. & Corn, J. E. PnB Designer: a web application to design prime and base editor guide RNAs for animals and plants. BMC Bioinformatics 22, 101 (2021).
Hwang, G. H. et al. PE-Designer and PE-Analyzer: web-based design and analysis tools for CRISPR prime editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W499–W504 (2021).
Anderson, M. V., Haldrup, J., Thomsen, E. A., Wolff, J. H. & Mikkelsen, J. G. pegIT—a web-based design tool for prime editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W505–W509 (2021).
Li, Y., Chen, J., Tsai, S. Q. & Cheng, Y. Easy-Prime: a machine learning-based prime editor design tool. Genome Biol. 22, 235 (2021).
Choi, J. et al. Precise genomic deletions using paired prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 218–226 (2022).
Jiang, T., Zhang, X. O., Weng, Z. & Xue, W. Deletion and replacement of long genomic sequences using prime editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 227–234 (2022).
Zhuang, Y. et al. Increasing the efficiency and precision of prime editing with guide RNA pairs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 29–37 (2022).
Bae, S., Park, J. & Kim, J. S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics 30, 1473–1475 (2014).
Doench, J. G. et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184–191 (2016).
Singh, R., Kuscu, C., Quinlan, A., Qi, Y. & Adli, M. Cas9-chromatin binding information enables more accurate CRISPR off-target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e118 (2015).
Hsu, P. D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827–832 (2013).
Kim, N. et al. Prediction of the sequence-specific cleavage activity of Cas9 variants. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1328–1336 (2020).
Wang, D. et al. Optimized CRISPR guide RNA design for two high-fidelity Cas9 variants by deep learning. Nat. Commun. 10, 4284 (2019).
Labuhn, M. et al. Refined sgRNA efficacy prediction improves large- and small-scale CRISPR–Cas9 applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 1375–1385 (2018).
Tang, X. et al. Plant prime editors enable precise gene editing in rice cells. Mol. Plant 13, 667–670 (2020).
Li, H., Li, J., Chen, J., Yan, L. & Xia, L. Precise modifications of both exogenous and endogenous genes in rice by prime editing. Mol. Plant 13, 671–674 (2020).
Xu, W. et al. Versatile nucleotides substitution in plant using an improved prime editing system. Mol. Plant 13, 675–678 (2020).
Xu, R. et al. Development of plant prime-editing systems for precise genome editing. Plant Commun. 1, 100043 (2020).
Hua, K., Jiang, Y., Tao, X. & Zhu, J. K. Precision genome engineering in rice using prime editing system. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 2167–2169 (2020).
Butt, H. et al. Engineering herbicide resistance via prime editing in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 2370–2372 (2020).
Wang, L. et al. Spelling changes and fluorescent tagging with prime editing vectors for plants. Front. Genome Ed. 3, 617553 (2021).
Shan, Q., Wang, Y., Li, J. & Gao, C. Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2395–2410 (2014).
Liu, Z. et al. Precise editing of methylated cytosine in Arabidopsis thaliana using a human APOBEC3Bctd–Cas9 fusion. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 219–222 (2021).
Tang, S. et al. Targeted DNA demethylation produces heritable epialleles in rice. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 753–756 (2021).
Lin, Q. et al. Genome editing in plants with MAD7 nuclease. J. Genet. Genomics 48, 444–451 (2021).
Allen, G. C., Flores-Vergara, M. A., Krasynanski, S., Kumar, S. & Thompson, W. F. A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2320–2325 (2006).
Liang, Z. et al. Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins. Nat. Protoc. 13, 413–430 (2018).
Jin, S., Gao, Q. & Gao, C. An unbiased method for evaluating the genome-wide specificity of base editors in rice. Nat. Protoc. 16, 431–457 (2021).
Jin, S. et al. Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice. Science 364, 292–295 (2019).
Jin, S. et al. Rationally designed APOBEC3B cytosine base editors with improved specificity. Mol. Cell 79, 728–740 (2020).

Optimized prime editing in monocot plants using PlantPegDesigner and engineered plant prime editors (ePPEs)

Extended

Supplementary information

推荐阅读