Analysis of sodium monofluoracetate (compound 1080) in animal kidney tissue by LC-MS/MS
Jim Langston
Disclaimer
Reference to any commercial materials, equipment, or process does not in any way constitute approval, endorsement, or recommendation by the Food and Drug Administration.
Abstract
This diagnostic method provides for the identification and quantitative analysis of sodium monofluoroacetate (Compound 1080) from kidney tissue using LC-MS/MS
Sodium monofluoroacetate (Compound 1080) is an EPA Category I toxin. In the US, its use is restricted to licensed applicators who may use it in bait collars to protect small ruminants. Animal intoxication and death
are reported, giving a need for a rapid, sensitive diagnostic method for detection and quantitation of Compound 1080 in animal tissues, including kidney. This SOP describes an LC-MS/MS method for the identification and quantitative analysis of Compound 1080 in kidney tissue at low ppb levels (e.g. ~5ppb). The method is rapid, sensitive, and selective.
Validation data (in-house and by an independent laboratory via collaborative study such as Blinded Method Test) are available upon request.
Before start
Calibration and spiking standard solutions are prepared using certified sodium
monofluoroacetate standard materials, provided either neat or in solution. Certified standard materials are available
from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories and other vendors. Isotopically labeled sodium monofluoroacetate13(23C22 d2-sodium monofluoroacetate) is available as an internal standard (IS) from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories and other vendors.
Steps
Prepare Reagents
5% Ammonium hydroxide in water
Combine 10mL
of ammonium hydroxide with 190mL
of water'
0.5% Trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile
Combine5mL
of trifluoroacetic acid with 995mL
of water
5 mM Ammonium formate, 0.01% formic acid in water (Mobile Phase A)
Dissolve 0.315g
of ammonium formate in approximately 950mL
ofwater in a 1 L volumetric flask.
Add 0.100mL
of formic acid, and fill to a final volume of 1.00L
with
water.
Store in an amber bottle.
Calibration standard solutions
Working standard solutions of sodium monofluoroacetate are prepared from neat material or
solution at 1, 0.1, and 0.01 µg/mL levels.
Calibration standards are prepared as shown in Table 1 below. Calibration standard solutions are preparedin from working standard solutions, diluting into 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid in
acetonitrile solvent.
A | B |
---|---|
Calibration Level | [Sodium Monofluoroacetate] ppb (ng/mL) |
1 | 0.10 |
2 | 0.25 |
3 | 0.50 |
4 | 1.00 |
5 | 2.50 |
6 | 5.00 |
7 | 10.0 |
8 | 25.0 |
9 | 50.0 |
Table 1. Calibration standard solutions
Working internal standard (IS) solutions are prepared from neat material or solution at 0.5 and 0.25 µg/mL levels.
Internal standard (IS) is added to each calibration standard at a concentration of 1.25
ppb (ng/mL).
Sample Preparation
Ensure all samples are finely chopped
Weigh 1g
(+/- 0.05 g) of sample into a 50 mL plastic centrifuge tube
Add 0.020mL
of 0.50 µg/mL 13C2, d2-sodium monofluoroacetate (IS) solution
Add 4mL
of water and 2 ball bearings
Genogrind at 750 rpm for 0h 5m 0s
Remove ball bearings using a magnet
Centrifuge to pellet at 4,000 x g, 0h 10m 0s
, 10 °C
Filter supernatant using a 6 mL syringe and a Whatman 1 µm GMF-150 syringe filter into a Pierce protein concentrator, PES, 3 kDa MWCO, 5 – 20 mL size
Centrifuge to obtain flow-through of a least 2 mL volume. Centrifuge set to 4,000 x g, 60 min, 10
°C. If insufficient flow-through obtained, repeat step with a new protein concentrator.
Further sample clean-up is next done using Waters Oasis MAX SPE cartridges, 500 mg, 6 cc:
Cartridges are positioned atop an SPE vacuum manifold
Pooled eluent is next analyzed by LC-MS/MS
Cartridges are first conditioned by rinsing with 4mL
of methanol, followed by rinsing with3mL
of water, and then an additional 3mL
of water
2mL
of the flow-through from the protein concentrator is next loaded onto the resin, taking care to load at a flow rate of no more than 1 drop per second
Cartridge is washed with 4mL
of 5% ammonium hydroxide in water
Cartridge is washed with 4mL
of methanol, and then pulled dry under vacuum for 0h 0m 30s
Cartridge is washed with 3 mL of 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile, and then pulled dry under vacuum for 0h 0m 30s
mL
Cartridge is washed another time with 3 mL of 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile, and then pulled dry under vacuum for 0h 0m 30s
A 15 mL centrifuge is placed under each SPE column as a collection tube, and then the cartridge is eluted with 2 mL of 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile at a flow rate of no more than 1 drop per second, and then pulled dry under vacuum for 0h 0m 30s
, collecting the eluent
The cartridge is eluted again with2mL
of 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile at a flow rate of no more than 1 drop per second, and then pulled dry under vacuum for 0h 0m 30s
, collecting the eluent in the same collection tube, for a total volume of 4mL
pooled eluent
Instrument Parameters
UHPLC Setting
Mobile Phase A: 5 mM Ammonium formate, 0.01% formic acid in water
MobilePhase B: Acetonitrile
Injection volume: 5 µL
Autosampler temperature: 10 °C
Column temperature: ambient room temperature
Gradient:
A | B | C | D |
---|---|---|---|
Time (min) | %A | %B | Flow Rate (mL/min) |
0 | 10 | 90 | 0.45 |
3 | 10 | 90 | 0.45 |
4 | 60 | 40 | 0.45 |
5.5 | 60 | 40 | 0.45 |
5.6 | 10 | 90 | 0.45 |
16 | 10 | 90 | 0.45 |
Mass spectrometer settings
Polarity: Negative
Ionization: ESI
Curtain gas: 40 psi
Ion source gas 1: 90 psi
Ion source gas 2: 40 psi
Temperature: 500 °C
Scan type: MRM
Ion spray voltage: 4000 volts
Mass table
A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Compound | Q1 mass (Da) | Q3 mass (Da) | Dwell Time (ms) | EP (V) | CE (V) | CXP (V) |
Quantifier Ion | 77 | 57 | 100 | -10 | -14 | -10 |
Qualifier Ion | 77 | 33 | 100 | -10 | -17 | -10 |
IS Ion | 81 | 60 | 100 | -10 | -16 | -6 |
Data is acquired using SciEx OS software
All calculations are performed using the Analyst software within SciEx OS software
Analytical Sequence
The sequence should begin and end with analysis of the calibration standards
The beginning set of standards are followed by a fortified control sample (spike) or overspiked sample
All sample and QC sample injections are done in duplicate
Sets of sample injections should be preceded by a reagent blank or an unfortified control sample (check) to demonstrate that no carryover from standards or fortified control is present
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
The analysis is acceptable if the reagent blank and/or check sample are negative, and reporting limit (RL) spike results for the analyte meets the criteria for positive identification (sec. 2, below).
An analyte is considered positively identified if it meets the following criteria:
The peak height signal to noise is greater than 3:1
The retention time of the analyte in the sample does not differ from that of the midpoint standard in the calibration curve by more than 0.25 min
The ratio of the peak area of the quantifier ion to that of the qualifier ion does not differ more
than 20% from either that of the average of the ion ratios from the calibration standards –-or- from that of the midpoint standard from the opening calibration curve.
The group leader, chief chemist or the toxicologist may approve deviations from these guidelines to meet the diagnostic utility of the test.
Criteria for Data Acceptance (Quantitation)- The following conditions must be met for a concentration to be reported for the analyte:
The peak area ratio of the analyte to that of its internal standard in the sample must fall within
the range of peak area ratios determined by the calibration curve
The spike recovery for the analyte should be between 70% and 120%.
If the sequence ends with a standard curve, then the two standardcurves are combined and the coefficient of determination (R2) for the combined curve must be >0.99.
If the sequence ends with a midpoint standard from the calibration curve, then the R2 for the analyte in the calibration curve must be 0.99 and the calculated concentration of analyte in the midpoint standard must fall within +/- 20%.
The group leader and/or chief chemist can approve any deviations from these guidelines to meet the diagnostic utility of this test.