Protocol for the acute electrical stimulation of thoracolumbar and sacral nerve roots and colonic motility measurements in anesthetized pigs

Mulugeta Million, Muriel Larauche, Yushan Wang, Yan-Peng Chen, Wentai Liu

Published: 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.17504/protocols.io.n2bvjr28plk5/v2

Disclaimer

The protocols.io team notes that research involving animals and humans must be conducted according to internationally-accepted standards and should always have prior approval from an Institutional Ethics Committee or Board.

Abstract

This protocol describes a process for the measurement of acute electrical stimulation-induced effects on colonic motility in anesthetized young adult Yucatan minipigs. Signals recorded from manometry probes inserted into the proximal, transverse and distal colonic regions were used to measure the effect of stimulation on the sacral or thoracolumbar nerve roots in an acute anesthetized preparation. The effect of stimulation was quantified as motility index/area under the curve (AUC) assessments before, during and after stimulation, and the data was used to create a functional map of colonic motor response to spinal nerve roots stimulation.

Before start

Steps

Animals

1.

Six-to-seven months old (25-36 kg) male Yucatan minipigs (S&S farms, Ramona, CA), castrated at 7 days of age, were group housed in pens (either bedding or grate floor depending on housing availabilities - 2 pigs/pen, 42ft2) in an environmentally controlled room (lights on/off 6AM/6PM, 61-81ºF) under SPF conditions.

All pigs were offered ad libitum access to diet (5p94 Prolab mini pig diet, PMI nutrition) and filtered tap water.

All husbandry practices and procedures conformed to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th edition) and were reviewed and approved by the UCLA Animal Research Committee (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee). All efforts were made to minimize any suffering as well as the number of animals used.

Surgical Procedures

2.

Pigs were fasted for at least 12h prior to surgery with free access to water.

For surgical level anesthesia, pigs were premedicated with midazolam (1 mg/kg),

ketamine (15 mg/kg)

and meloxicam (0.3 mg/kg) injected intramuscularly.

They were then intubated, connected to a respirator for ventilation (breathing rate maintained between 13-16 breaths/min), and maintained under general anesthesia with 1-3% inhaled isoflurane.

Maintenance fluids (lactated ringers ) were administered at 10 ml/kg/h.

During the first part of the surgical procedure, pigs were positioned on a heating pad (32°C) in supine position.

A femoral artery line was placed. When needed, the artery line was flushed with sterile saline containing 0.5% heparin.

A midline abdominal incision was performed to gain access the peritoneum. Three colonic regions of interest -proximal/ascending, transverse, distal/descending - were identified and externalized.

Still-manometry probes (Mikro-CathTM diagnostic pressure catheter, #825-0101, Millar, Houston, TX) were inserted into the colon via a small incision and maintained in position with a loophole silk ligature.

Equipment

ValueLabel
Mikro-Cath™NAME
Pressure catheterTYPE
MillarBRAND
825-0101SKU

For the proximal colon, 4 manometry probes were inserted about 10 cm below the ceco-colic junction, at 10, 13, 16 and 19 cm from the point of entry. For the transverse colon, 4 manometry probes were inserted at the end of the proximal colon, at 10, 13, 16 and 19 cm from the point of entry. Distal probes were inserted in the distal colon through the anus with sensors at 10, 13, 16 and 19 cm proximal to the anal verge. One sensor was also added in the anal canal (2 cm from the anal verge).

The abdomen was then closed and pigs placed on prone position, leaving access to the back.

The S1-S4 sacral spinal nerves or T12-L1 thoracolumbar spinal nerves were accessed via a laminectomy.(surgery time: 30 min-40 min).

Laminectomy is a common spine operation and refers to surgical removal of the vertebral lamina, thereby unroofing the vertebral canal. We followed similar processes as described in this reference.

Before surgery, we palpated the lumbar spinous processes along the midline and identified the vertebral levels of interest (T12-L1 or S1-S4). A midline incision using a scalpel/electrocautery was then performed and the subcutaneous tissue and fat dissected to gain access to the thoracolumbar or lumbosacral fascia, respectively. The fascia along the midline was cut to expose the supraspinous ligaments spanning between spinous processes. The supraspinous ligaments was open over a few millimiters. Then using a Freer elevator, the supraspinous ligaments was gently detached from spinous processes (subperiosteal dissection). The dissection was then extended to the interspinous ligaments up to the facet joints of the spinous processes along the area of interest. After locating the lamina, we opened the lamina using a surgical saw or a Kerrison rongeur to extract bone in a piece-wise fashion over the whole vertebral segment of interest in order to gain access to the ligamentum flavum, periosteum, epidural fat, and dura sac. The spinous processes corresponding to the region of interest were removed, allowing access to the meninges. The epidural fat was gently removed taking care not to damage the dura sac and allowing identification of the spinal roots.

During the surgical procedure and as the laminectomy was completed, hemostasis was performed with bipolar electrosurgery. Monopolar electrosurgery was not used because of the proximity of neural structures.

Bone wax was placed along sites of bleeding from exposed bone and absorbable hemostat dressing were used to obtain hemostasis near soft tissue. We also used cotton to wick serous fluid and blood away from the dissection where necessary.

The pigs were euthanized at the end of the experiment with an intravenous injection of pentobarbital (100 mg/kg).

Stimulation experiment

3.

After surgery, the left thoracolumbar (T12-L1) and sacral root nerves (S1, S2, S3 and S4) were identified and isolated using small pieces of cotton. Needle or cuff electrodes (NCX-2.5-3-500umPR-1-1-500SS-SUT, Microprobes for Life Science Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA) were placed on the roots.

Equipment

ValueLabel
NCX-2.5-3-500umPR-1-1-500SS-SUTNAME
nerve cuff electrodeTYPE
Microprobes for Life Science Inc.BRAND
customSKU
https://microprobes.com/LINK
X-wide contact nerve cuff electrode with 3 contacts made of 500 um platinum iridium ribbon, Cuff ID= 2.5 mmSPECIFICATIONS

After positioning the stimulation electrodes, recording of the colonic motility using manometry began.

Manometry measurements were made by connecting the still-manometry probes (Mikro-CathTM diagnostic pressure catheter, #825-0101, Millar, Houston, TX)

Equipment

ValueLabel
Mikro-Cath™NAME
Pressure catheterTYPE
MillarBRAND
825-0101SKU

via pressure cables (PEC-10D, #850-5090, Millar, Houston, TX)

Equipment

ValueLabel
PEC-10DNAME
Pressure cableTYPE
MillarBRAND
850-5090SKU

to a transducer (PCU-2000, Millar, Houston, TX)

Equipment

ValueLabel
PCU-2000NAME
Dual Channel Pressure Control UnitTYPE
MillarBRAND
880-0129SKU

itself connected to a data acquisition system (Micro 1401, CED, Cambridge, UK)

Equipment

ValueLabel
Micro 1401NAME
Data acquisition unitTYPE
Cambridge Electronic Design, LtdBRAND
CED 1401SKU

and raw data were collected using the Spike 2 software (CED, Cambridge, UK).

Software

ValueLabel
Spike 2NAME
WindowsOS_NAME
7OS_VERSION
Cambridge Electronic Design, LtdDEVELOPER
http://ced.co.uk/products/spkovinLINK
7.10VERSION

A baseline was established for a period of at least 30 min, then the stimulation was initiated.

Thoracolumbar nerve electrical stimulation (TLNS) was performed on T12 and L1 roots, using a needle electrode unilaterally positioned on the left root targeting afferent (dorsal root) or both afferent/efferent fibers (dorsal and ventral roots past the DRG), without block. Two different stimulation protocols were performed 10 Hz, 0.3 ms, 0.5 mA, continuous (30 s on, 90s off) or 30 Hz, 0.3 ms, 0.5 mA, pulse-train (30 s on, 90 s off) for 10 min.

Sacral nerve electrical stimulation (SNS) was performed on S1, S2, S3 and S4 roots using a cuff electrode placed unilaterally on the left dorsal root or both ventral/dorsal root. Stimulation was done at 30 Hz, 0.3ms, 0.5 mA, pulse-train (30 s on, 90 s off) with or without afferent (AB) or efferent (EB) block (40 kHz, 0.1 ms, 2 mA) for 10 min.

Following stimulation, recording continued for at least another 30 minutes.

4.

Recording of motility data began after surgery was complete and continued for at least 30 min for stabilization of baseline motility, and then for at least another 30 min following completion of the stimulation experiment.

The data in the accompanying dataset was obtained by analyzing the following two subsets of that entire recording: (1) 30 min prior to stimulation; and (2) the 40 minutes immediately following the onset of stimulation (10 min during stimulation, together with another 30 min of recording post stimulation).

The raw manometry data were filtered and rectified using a lab-written Spike 2 code. The same code provided the motility index (MI) defined as the the area under the curve before, during and after stimulation per each minute.

推荐阅读

Nature Protocols
Protocols IO
Current Protocols
扫码咨询