Microinjection Techniques in Fly Embryos to Study the Function and Dynamics of SMC Complexes

Catarina Carmo, Margarida Araújo, Raquel Oliveira

Published: 2021-09-03 DOI: 10.17504/protocols.io.bnx6mfre

Abstract

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins are critical to maintain mitotic fidelity in all organisms. Over the last decades, acute inactivation of these complexes, together with the analysis of their dynamic binding to mitotic chromatin, has provided important insights on the molecular mechanism of these complexes as well as into the consequences of their failure at different stages of mitosis.

Here, we describe a methodology to study both SMC function and dynamics using Drosophila melanogaster syncytial embryos. This system presents several advantages over canonical inactivation or imaging approaches. Efficient and fast inactivation of SMC complexes can be achieved by the use of tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease in vivo to cleave engineered versions of the SMC complexes. In contrast to genetically encoded TEV protease expression, Drosophila embryos enable prompt delivery of the protease by microinjection techniques, as detailed here, thereby allowing inactivation of the complexes within few minutes. Such an acute inactivation approach, when coupled with real-time imaging, allows for the analysis of the immediate consequences upon protein inactivation. As described here, this system also presents unique advantages to follow the kinetics of the loading of SMC complexes onto mitotic chromatin. We describe the use of Drosophila embryos to study localization and turnover of these molecules through live imaging and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) approaches.

Steps

Collecting and Preparing Embryos for Live Imaging

1.

Set up a cage with the fly strain of your choosing. Use an apple juice plate with a smear of fresh yeast paste at the bottom of the cage.

Note
When setting a cage, take into consideration that older flies have a decreased egg-laying capacity. Males that have matured for over 3 days mate more efficiently and females reach their peak of egg laying 4–7 days after eclosion.Take into consideration that flies tend to lay more eggs during the night-time. If more convenient, cages can be kept inside a box with an inverted light–dark cycle (e.g., to become dark at 12 pm and light at 12 am). In this manner, flies will lay more eggs during the afternoon.Set up a cage for at least a full day before the day of experiments, in order for flies to acclimatize to the cage and fully recover from CO2anesthesia.As flies are attracted by the smell of fruit and eat yeast, they will be attracted to the apple juice plate with yeast paste, and lay a lot of eggs that can be collected.

2.

Change plates at least once a day, even on days without experiments. To do this, invert the cage, tap it strongly, so as to bring the flies to the bottom, and exchange plates.

3.

On the day of the experiments, start with a precollection of 1h 0m 0s2h 0m 0s to release retained eggs and increase staging accuracy.

Note
Flies tend to hold embryos before depositing them but fresh yeast paste stimulates the egg laying. Changing the plates every morning will ensure that you remove the embryos held overnight in their oviducts. This will also give a good idea of the egg-laying efficiency.

4.

The time of collection will depend on the desired developmental time—shorter collection times for early divisions and longer collection times for late developmental stages. For example, to collect embryos that are, at most, at nuclear division 10 (blastoderm nuclei), corresponding to 1h 30m 0s of development, you may want to start with a collection of 1h 15m 0s, counting with ~0h 15m 0s for embryo preparation.

5.

To collect embryos from the agar plate (Fig. 3a), use an artist’s brush (moist with water) and swipe them onto a cell strainer, placed on a container with tap water.

Fig. 3 Preparation of embryo samples for microinjection/live imaging. (a) Embryo collection in apple juice agar plates with yeast paste (see step 1). (b) (1) Higher magnification of A. (b) (2) Embryos after dechorionation (see step 5). (b) (3) Alignment of embryos in an agar block, before being transferred onto a previously prepared slide with heptane glue (see steps 7–12.)A and P indicate the anterior and posterior pole, respectively; asterisks denote the micropyle. Scale bar: 500 μm
Fig. 3 Preparation of embryo samples for microinjection/live imaging. (a) Embryo collection in apple juice agar plates with yeast paste (see step 1). (b) (1) Higher magnification of A. (b) (2) Embryos after dechorionation (see step 5). (b) (3) Alignment of embryos in an agar block, before being transferred onto a previously prepared slide with heptane glue (see steps 7–12.)A and P indicate the anterior and posterior pole, respectively; asterisks denote the micropyle. Scale bar: 500 μm
6.

Briefly remove excess water on a tissue paper and transfer the embryo containing cell strainer to a container with 50%(v/v) bleach. Incubate for 0h 2m 0s at 4Room temperature. This will remove nontransparent chorion (dechorionation), essential for injection and imaging.

Note
Time left on bleach solution will depend on embryo’s resistance; more fragile embryos may require less time. Also, by the end of the day, the bleach solution will become weaker and it may be required to leave embryos longer.

7.

Remove excess bleach solution with a tissue paper. Wash embryos with a squeeze bottle with distilled water. Water pressure from the bottle directly on the embryos will help in the removal of chorion. Rinse the embryo containing cell strainer in the container with tap water.

Note
Replace the water from the tap water container between collections and wash the cell strainer with the help of an artist’s brush in order to get rid of remainders of bleach and embryos (from the cell strainer).

8.

Cut a small block of a clean apple juice agar with a scalpel and place it on a coverslip, to be viewed under a stereo microscope.

9.

Using a 24 × 60 mm coverslip, place around 6µL8µL in the middle of the coverslip as a single row and tilt it to make it spread as an even layer. This will be used to mount the embryos for live imaging.

For injections: take a smaller coverslip (18 × 18 or 22 × 22 mm) and place it so as to overlay approximately half of the glue layer (Fig. 2 for scheme).

Fig. 2 Slide preparation for microinjection/live imaging. A thin layer of heptane glue is placed in the middle of a large coverslip (e.g., 24 × 60 mm). A smaller coverslip (e.g., 18 × 18 or 22 × 22 mm) is placed on top leaving half of the glue area for the embryos. For posterior injections the coverslip should be on the left side facing the anterior pole of the embryos
Fig. 2 Slide preparation for microinjection/live imaging. A thin layer of heptane glue is placed in the middle of a large coverslip (e.g., 24 × 60 mm). A smaller coverslip (e.g., 18 × 18 or 22 × 22 mm) is placed on top leaving half of the glue area for the embryos. For posterior injections the coverslip should be on the left side facing the anterior pole of the embryos
10.

Transfer embryos from the cell strainer using a brush and place them on the agar block, with the aid of a steel probe. Dechorionated embryos should have an ovoid shape without the dorsal appendages (Fig. 3b2).

Fig. 3 Preparation of embryo samples for microinjection/live imaging. (a) Embryo collection in apple juice agar plates with yeast paste (see step 1). (b) (1) Higher magnification of A. (b) (2) Embryos after dechorionation (see step 5). (b) (3) Alignment of embryos in an agar block, before being transferred onto a previously prepared slide with heptane glue (see steps 7–12.)A and P indicate the anterior and posterior pole, respectively; asterisks denote the micropyle. Scale bar: 500 μm
Fig. 3 Preparation of embryo samples for microinjection/live imaging. (a) Embryo collection in apple juice agar plates with yeast paste (see step 1). (b) (1) Higher magnification of A. (b) (2) Embryos after dechorionation (see step 5). (b) (3) Alignment of embryos in an agar block, before being transferred onto a previously prepared slide with heptane glue (see steps 7–12.)A and P indicate the anterior and posterior pole, respectively; asterisks denote the micropyle. Scale bar: 500 μm
11.

Align the embryos in a row, making sure all face the same direction (i.e., every embryo has the anterior side, marked by micropyle, oriented to the same direction). Use the edge of the agar block as a reference (Fig. 3b2).

Fig. 3 Preparation of embryo samples for microinjection/live imaging. (a) Embryo collection in apple juice agar plates with yeast paste (see step 1). (b) (1) Higher magnification of A. (b) (2) Embryos after dechorionation (see step 5). (b) (3) Alignment of embryos in an agar block, before being transferred onto a previously prepared slide with heptane glue (see steps 7–12.)A and P indicate the anterior and posterior pole, respectively; asterisks denote the micropyle. Scale bar: 500 μm
Fig. 3 Preparation of embryo samples for microinjection/live imaging. (a) Embryo collection in apple juice agar plates with yeast paste (see step 1). (b) (1) Higher magnification of A. (b) (2) Embryos after dechorionation (see step 5). (b) (3) Alignment of embryos in an agar block, before being transferred onto a previously prepared slide with heptane glue (see steps 7–12.)A and P indicate the anterior and posterior pole, respectively; asterisks denote the micropyle. Scale bar: 500 μm
12.

Once aligned, take the preprepared 24 × 60 mm coverslip (see step 9) and with the glue side facing down lower it until you glue the embryos, by gently pressing on the agar block. Keep it parallel to the smaller coverslip, with the micropyle facing this side (for posterior end injections).

Note
Proper attachment of the embryos onto the coverslip is a critical step for successful injections to avoid that the embryo “escapes” the glue once the needle approaches. Embryos must, therefore, be sufficiently dry, as water can compromise their attachment.

13.

For injections only: leave the preparation to dry for 0h 10m 0s0h 14m 0s.

Note
An extended drying step is critical for injections to decrease the osmotic pressure of the embryo and thereby prevent bursting and cytoplasmic ejection once pierced.

14.

Using a 20–200 μl tip, take halocarbon oil and place it on top the row of aligned embryos and part of the smaller coverslip. This will keep embryos moist and oxygenated.

15.

Samples are ready for the following processes, including live cell imaging of unperturbed embryos (see next section).

Microinjection Techniques in Fly Embryos

16.

Note
For microinjection experiments, 1–1.5 h old embryos (or 0–30 min for mRNA injections) must be collected and processed according to protocol described above. Embryos should preferentially be injected (up to three consecutive injections) at the posterior side—owing to a more uniform surface while maintaining the shape and preventing extensive loss of cytoplasm. Here we describe the use of prepulled needles to ensure repeatability.

17.

Before usage, centrifuge your microinjection sample at high speed for 0h 30m 0s at 4°C, so as to impede precipitates to be extracted and possibly clog the injection needle.

18.

Load the needles using Microloader Tips. Take care not to leave air bubbles during loading, as it will make injection impossible. Prepare all needles needed before starting the experiment, to minimize time between injections.

19.

Once at the microscope, first turn on the injector controller and the micromanipulator. Then, place the first needle in the holder—must be tight to maintain correct pressure—and connect the capillary to the pressure pump afterward.

20.

Using the lower magnification objective (10× or 20×), put the needle down slowly in the focal plane of the smaller coverslip. When the needle is close to the coverslip you will start seeing a shadow through the lens (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4 Details about microinjections in Drosophila embryos. (a) (1–3) Bring the needle into the focal plane. (b) (1–4) Open the needle with the help of the smaller coverslip and test drop size (4 shows a good-sized drop) (c) Inject the embryo at the posterior pole: upon initial contact, the embryo membranes retract (2 and 3). Move the needle further until it goes through the embryo (4). 6 displays a second injection using the same injection site
Fig. 4 Details about microinjections in Drosophila embryos. (a) (1–3) Bring the needle into the focal plane. (b) (1–4) Open the needle with the help of the smaller coverslip and test drop size (4 shows a good-sized drop) (c) Inject the embryo at the posterior pole: upon initial contact, the embryo membranes retract (2 and 3). Move the needle further until it goes through the embryo (4). 6 displays a second injection using the same injection site
21.

Prepulled needles need to be further opened prior to injections. The smaller coverslip next to the row of aligned embryos will serve as a barrier to break the tip of the needle and thus to open it. Press gently the needle against the edge of the coverslip until it breaks slightly and try several injections until the correct droplet size is achieved. Press the injection button and evaluate the size of the drop (Fig. 4b), where 6 shows an appropriate drop, that should range from 30 to 50 μm in diameter (up to one-tenth of embryo length). The size of the droplet can be controlled by regulating the amount of pressure and the injection time, for example, when using an Eppendorf FemtoJet Microinjector controller. If the needle gets clogged, it can be opened further using the same strategy as before.

22.

To perform an injection, as the needle comes in contact with the embryo’s posterior pole, notice how the membranes retract with it (Fig. 4c2, 3 and ESM Movie S1). Move the needle further until it goes through the embryo (Fig. 4c4) and inject.

23.

For multiple injections, change the needle and inject the second/third solution through the same hole. The small opening from the first injection facilitates the entry of the second needle inside the embryo, without membrane retraction. Figure 4c6 displays a second injection using the same injection site.

Note
Sequential injections should be performed exactly at the same site to avoid cytoplasm release. To facilitate this process, ensure a wide opening during the first injection. This can be achieved either by breaking slightly more the first needle to be used or by introducing it further inside the embryo (the wider part of the needle helps to introduce an opening which is then easier to find in subsequent injections).If it is not possible to spot the opening, the needle can be used to probe where the injection site is by scrolling up and down slowly through the posterior side of the embryo until it gets in by itself.

Inactivation of SMC Complexes by TEV Cleavage

24.

Note
TEV-mediated inactivation requires prior establishment of Drosophila strains surviving solely on the TEV-cleavable version of the protein. Strains should also contain the desired fluorescent markers (e.g., H2Av- or H2B-fluorescently tagged proteins to monitor chromatin behavior). This strategy allows full and acute inactivation of targeted proteins in a time-resolved manner and thus can be applied to investigate both the establishment and maintenance of the intricate mitotic chromosome morphology. As an example of a time-restricted inactivation protocol, we detail the steps for cohesin inactivation in metaphase-arrested embryos, as originally described in [15].

Note
The experimental layout described here focuses on the use of TEV protease to study the role of SMC complexes in the maintenance of metaphase chromosome structure. Canonical studies on the role of these complexes for the establishment of chromosome architecture can be achieved by injection of TEV during interphase, leading to precocious sister chromatid disjunction (for cohesin) or impaired sister chromatid resolution (condensin) [9, 15], depending on the question to be addressed.

25.

Use your reference channel (e.g., fluorescent histones) to select an embryo with the required nuclear density and in late interphase using a 63× or 100× lens.

26.

Switch to a lower magnification lens for injections.

27.

Induce a metaphase arrest through the injections of 12mg/mL30mg/mL into the embryo. Imaging acquisition can be performed (using a 63× or 100× lens). After 0h 6m 0s0h 8m 0s, every nucleus should have their chromosomes aligned forming the metaphase plate (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5 TEV-mediated inactivation of cohesin during metaphase. (a) and (b) are still images from time lapse movies in which two sequential injections were performed. (a) Injection of 18 mg/ml of UbcH10C114S to induce a metaphase arrest. (1) Embryos are injected during interphase (t = 0) and arrest in the subsequent metaphase (t = 6 min). (2) Crop from previous stills showing a single nucleus at t = 0 and t = 6 min after injection with UbcH10C114S respectively. (b) (1) Nuclei arrested in metaphase, after injection with TEV protease (12 mg/ml); sister chromatid separation is observed within 1–2 min. (b) (2) Crop from previous stills showing a single nucleus at t = 30 s, t = 1 min and t = 2.5 min after TEV protease injection, respectively. Live imaging was performed using a confocal spinning disk microscope with MetaMorph acquisition software, using a 100× immersion (oil) objective. Time-lapse series were processed using Fiji. Scale bar: 5 μm
Fig. 5 TEV-mediated inactivation of cohesin during metaphase. (a) and (b) are still images from time lapse movies in which two sequential injections were performed. (a) Injection of 18 mg/ml of UbcH10C114S to induce a metaphase arrest. (1) Embryos are injected during interphase (t = 0) and arrest in the subsequent metaphase (t = 6 min). (2) Crop from previous stills showing a single nucleus at t = 0 and t = 6 min after injection with UbcH10C114S respectively. (b) (1) Nuclei arrested in metaphase, after injection with TEV protease (12 mg/ml); sister chromatid separation is observed within 1–2 min. (b) (2) Crop from previous stills showing a single nucleus at t = 30 s, t = 1 min and t = 2.5 min after TEV protease injection, respectively. Live imaging was performed using a confocal spinning disk microscope with MetaMorph acquisition software, using a 100× immersion (oil) objective. Time-lapse series were processed using Fiji. Scale bar: 5 μm
28.

Subsequently, perform a second injection with TEV protease at 5mg/mL10mg/mL. If the protease is at this concentration, sister chromatid separation should be observed within 0h 1m 0s0h 2m 0s after TEV protease injection in flies carrying TEV-sensitive cohesin complexes (Fig. 5b).

Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP)

29.

Note
FRAP studies on chromatin-binding proteins revealed that many have a very dynamic behavior, with turnover within seconds (e.g., transcription factors [29]). In contrast, both cohesin and condensin complexes were shown to display a slow turnover or be stably bound to mitotic chromatin [19, 20, 22]. More importantly, turnover rates may also vary for specific time points of cell cycle. Thus, microinjection techniques can be used to arrest the fast embryonic cycles at specific stages, thereby enabling long-term FRAP experiments. What follows below is an example of analysis of condensin I turnover on mitotic chromosomes, similar to the one previously published [22]. For this analysis, strains expressing fluorescent-tagged versions of the protein of interest are required.

30.

Use your reference channel (e.g., fluorescent histones) to select an embryo with the required nuclear density and in late-interphase using a 63× or 100× lens.

31.

Switch to a lower magnification lens for injections.

32.

Inject 12mg/mL30mg/mL UbcH10C114S C114S(intact spindle forces) or 2millimolar (mM) into the embryo to induce a metaphase arrest, if required. After 0h 6m 0s0h 8m 0s, every nucleus should be arrested in prometaphase or metaphase.

Note
Depending on the anticipated time of recovery, FRAP analysis can be performed in cycling embryos instead of inducing a metaphase arrest.

33.

Select a field for imaging, preferably including the nuclei closer to the coverslip.

34.

Image for a short period a time (e.g., 0h 2m 0s) before inducing a bleaching pulse. This will provide a reference for basal fluorescent intensity before bleaching and recovery occur.

Note
For FRAP analysis it is crucial to minimize photodamage stimulated by laser/light power. Time between frames should also be short enough to detect fast exchange events but without further enhancing phototoxicity (e.g., 30 s/frame).

35.

According to the imaging software available to induce FRAP, draw ROIs of the nuclei to be bleached, bleaching a maximum of one-fourth of the metaphases in the field (see Fig. 6a).

Note
Several options can be used for the shape and size ROI to be bleached: bleaching of entire metaphases, bleaching of half metaphase, or bleaching of a smaller area within the metaphase (e.g., a small circle, rectangle). Be aware that recovery dynamics may be challenged by larger areas simply due to bleaching of a higher number of fluorescent molecules. Also, nuclei, although arrested at metaphase, will not be static, and may hinder FRAP efficiency. We find it best to bleach half of a metaphase plate, where the other unbleached half can be used as an internal control.
Fig. 6 Example of a typical FRAP experiment with Barren-EGFP expressing embryos. (a) (1) Still image of a UAS-Barren-EGFP embryo [22] arrested at metaphase with 12 mg/ml of UbcH10C114S. (a) (2) Close-up of representative still images of a metaphase plate during a FRAP experiment. Fire LUT was used to emphasize a photobleaching event and subsequent recovery of fluorescence intensity. Dashed areas indicate the half-metaphase plate where it was induced a bleaching pulse. Fluorescence intensity can be measured using a small circular ROI from bleached half metaphase plate—dashed circle, and controlled with the corresponding unbleached half metaphase plate—full circle. Live imaging was performed using a confocal spinning disk microscope with MetaMorph acquisition software, using a 63× immersion (oil) objective. Time-lapse series were processed using Fiji Scale bar: 2 μm. (b) Three possible scenarios can arise from a FRAP experiment: (1) after bleaching pulse, no fluorescence recovery is detected, hence, no turnover is deduced; (2) fluorescence intensity increases after pulse but not similar to prepulse intensities, indicating there was some exchange of molecules; (3) full recovery of fluorescence intensity to similar levels as before pulse, suggestive of a highly dynamic turnover. # shows the time of bleaching pulse. The difference between the plateau andy0 indicates the mobile fraction.t(time) to which half of plateau’s fluorescence intensity corresponds is the half-time
Fig. 6 Example of a typical FRAP experiment with Barren-EGFP expressing embryos. (a) (1) Still image of a UAS-Barren-EGFP embryo [22] arrested at metaphase with 12 mg/ml of UbcH10C114S. (a) (2) Close-up of representative still images of a metaphase plate during a FRAP experiment. Fire LUT was used to emphasize a photobleaching event and subsequent recovery of fluorescence intensity. Dashed areas indicate the half-metaphase plate where it was induced a bleaching pulse. Fluorescence intensity can be measured using a small circular ROI from bleached half metaphase plate—dashed circle, and controlled with the corresponding unbleached half metaphase plate—full circle. Live imaging was performed using a confocal spinning disk microscope with MetaMorph acquisition software, using a 63× immersion (oil) objective. Time-lapse series were processed using Fiji Scale bar: 2 μm. (b) Three possible scenarios can arise from a FRAP experiment: (1) after bleaching pulse, no fluorescence recovery is detected, hence, no turnover is deduced; (2) fluorescence intensity increases after pulse but not similar to prepulse intensities, indicating there was some exchange of molecules; (3) full recovery of fluorescence intensity to similar levels as before pulse, suggestive of a highly dynamic turnover. # shows the time of bleaching pulse. The difference between the plateau andy0 indicates the mobile fraction.t(time) to which half of plateau’s fluorescence intensity corresponds is the half-time

36.

Induce the pulse.

Note
When optimizing bleaching pulses, take care that they should be short, typically less than 20 ms, in order to avoid phototoxicity for the sample and localized heating of the sample, generated by high laser intensity [34]. As such, increasing the laser power works better than increasing the timing of the bleaching pulse. This is also useful to minimize the diffusion effect of fluorescent molecules during the pulse [18].

37.

Image immediately after bleaching for a longer period of time (e.g., 0h 15m 0s), keeping the same settings as prebleaching imaging.

38.

Analyze the recovery using quantitative imaging software (e.g., Fiji [30]).

39.

The mean fluorescence intensity can be normalized in several ways (e.g., to the first time point before pulse (t0) or to unbleached half metaphase for each time point).

Note
Several options can be used for the shape and size ROI to be bleached: bleaching of entire metaphases, bleaching of half metaphase, or bleaching of a smaller area within the metaphase (e.g., a small circle, rectangle). Be aware that recovery dynamics may be challenged by larger areas simply due to bleaching of a higher number of fluorescent molecules. Also, nuclei, although arrested at metaphase, will not be static, and may hinder FRAP efficiency. We find it best to bleach half of a metaphase plate, where the other unbleached half can be used as an internal control.

40.

Plot the relative mean fluorescence intensity versus time in a xy manner.

41.

For estimation of protein turnover, fit the data to the appropriate function (e.g., the One Phase Association equation ) can be used to estimate several dynamic parameters, as indicated in Table 1).

AB
VariableDefinition
Y0Value of y at t = 0 Expressed in the same units of y
PlateauValue that y tends to for infinite of x Expressed in the same units of y
KRate constant Expressed in –t (inverse of x units)
TauTime constant Expressed in the inverse of y units
Half-timeTime of fluorescence recovery after the pulse where the fluorescence intensity is half of the final recovered intensity Expressed in the same units of x
Span (mobile fraction)Difference in intensity between y0 and plateau Expressed in the same units of y

Table 1Quantitative variables from one-phase association curve fitting

42.

FRAP will result in three possible scenarios: no recovery of fluorescence intensity, indicating that there was no replacement of fluorescent molecules and hence, the protein is stable and did not turn over; partial recovery of fluorescence intensity or complete recovery of fluorescence intensity, where there was limited or complete exchange of the tagged protein (Fig. 6b) [31].

推荐阅读

Nature Protocols
Protocols IO
Current Protocols
扫码咨询