Ambrecht et al. 2020: An optimized method for the extraction of ancient eukaryote DNA from marine sediments
Linda Armbrecht
ancient DNA
diatoms
dinoflagellates
haptophytes
Maria Island
metagenomics
plankton
seafloor
Tasmania
Abstract
Four combinations of sedaDNA extraction treatments using marine sediments collected at a water depth of 104 m off Maria Island in Tasmania are compared. These methods contrast frozen versus refrigerated sediment, bead-beating induced cell lysis versus ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) incubation, DNA binding in silica spin columns versus in silica-solution.
All four methods worked to varying degrees; see paper for recommended shotgun library preparation
Before start
Sediment processing and pretreatment:
Core section processing, sedaDNA extractions and sequencing library preparations took place at ACAD's ultraclean forensic facilities following aDNA decontamination standards (Willerslev & Cooper, 2005). We placed the three sediment core sections into zip-lock bags sterilised with UV light and manually homogenized them for ~5 min. From each section, two 1 cm3 subsamples were transferred into two separate 15 ml centrifuge tubes using a sterile disposable spatula. One subsample was kept at 4°C and the other at –20°C for one month. The samples were prepared for the different extraction methods in a glove box decontaminated (3% bleach) between consecutive subsamples.
Attachments
Steps
Shotgun sequencing library preparation
Libraries containing 20 μl input DNA and small DNA fragments only (“Si_s”)
To target relatively small DNA fragments typical of aDNA, we per- formed a ‘reverse AxyPrep’ DNA purification post-library prepa- ration. For this, we prepared four additional libraries as described in Section 2.3.1.2, except that we added AxyPrep beads in a ratio 1:0.4 library:beads in the first clean-up step (aiming to retain frag- ments ≤500 bp). After 15 min of incubation and 15 min on a mag- netic rack to separate beads from the supernatant, we transferred the supernatant into a new sterile 1.7 ml tube. AxyPrep beads were added in a ratio 1:1.2 library:beads. Following two washes with 80% EtOH, we eluted the DNA in 30 μl Buffer EB with 0.05% Tween 20.
All libraries prepared in Sections 2.3.1.1–2.3.1.3 (23 in total) were quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay (Molecular Probes).
Based on the Qubit results, we designed a sequencing pool contain- ing 4 ng of DNA per library. As the EBCs contained only traces of DNA, we also prepared a second sequencing pool with 10 μl per EBC library. We then ran a PCR on these two sequencing pools (eight replicates with 25 μl reactions each) following Section 2.3.1, except that we used Indexing Primer IS4 and the GAII index 1 (Meyer & Kircher, 2010) and 13 cycles. Post-PCR quantifications of both pools were conducted using Qubit and merged into a third sequencing pool. To avoid over-diluting the latter sequencing pool, we used 4 ng DNA from pool 1 and 0.4 ng DNA from pool 2. The DNA quality and quantity of the third sequencing pool was assessed through TapeStation (Agilent Technologies). AxyPrep clean-up (at a ratio of 1:1.1 library:beads) and TapeStation checks were repeated twice to generate a high-quality sequencing pool (i.e., a minimal amount of primer-dimer, DNA concentration = 6.36 ng/μl). We submitted the final pool to the Australian Cancer Research Foundation Cancer Genomics Facility & Centre for Cancer Biology, Adelaide, Australia (hereafter ACRF) for Illumina NextSeq sequencing (2 × 75 bp cycle).
Libraries containing 20 μl input DNA (“Si20_20”)
In order to test whether relatively low or high amounts of input DNA affected library quality and sequencing results (particularly, whether PCR inhibition might become problematic, or whether larger DNA input volumes would benefit sequencing), we prepared four addi- tional libraries based on the DNA extracts derived from the Si20 ex- traction (three sediment extracts and one EBC; see Section 2.2.3). For these libraries we used 10× DNA input, totalling 20 μl per sam- ple, then followed Section 2.3.1.1 (Figure 1).
Method 1: Bead-beating + spin column (DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil Kit, Qiagen; “Kit”)
This technique was applied to 0.25g
of sediment subsamples stored at 4°C
, following the manufacturer's protocol with the some modifications:
TRANSFER sediment into individual bead-tubes using a disposable, sterile spatula
APPLY bead-beating in three runs of 0h 0m 20s
with 0h 0m 5s
breaks using a Precellys 24 homogenizer
CENTRIFUGE at 10319
for 0h 0m 30s
RETAIN all optional 0h 5m 0s
incubation steps at 4°C
per the kit's protocol
ELUTE DNA in 80µL
of Buffer EB instead of the customary C6 solution and store at -20°C
Method 2: Bead-beating + liquid silica in QG Buffer (“Si4” and “Si20”)
This lysis process was applied to 0.25g
of the subsamples stored at both 4°C
and -20°C
FOLLOW the same protocol as described in Section 1 down to step 10 of the manufacturer's instructions (addition of Solution C3 and subsequent centrifugation)
AFTER this step...
TRANSFER the supernatant to 15 mL centrifuge tubes containing a DNA-binding buffer
STIR on a rotary mixer for at Room temperature
CENTRIFUGE at 4500rpm
for 0h 5m 0s
DISCARD supernatant
RESUSPEND pellet in 900µL
of DNA-binding buffer
RE-CENTRIFUGE at 14000rpm
for 0h 1m 0s
DISCARD the supernatant
WASH the pellet twice in 80%
ethanol
DRY pellet for 0h 15m 0s
at 37°C
RESUSPEND pellet in 80µL
Buffer EB
FOLLOWING incubation for 0h 10m 0s
at 50°C
, centrifuge at 14.000rpm,0h 0m 0s
for 0h 1m 0s
STORE the supernatant (free of silica) in a sterile Lo-bind tube (Eppendorf) at -20°C
Method 3: EDTA + MinElute (“EDTA”)
This technique was applied to 0.25g
sediment subsamples stored at 4°C
following Slon et al. (2017) with minor modifications
ADD 1mL
of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to the sediment in a 2 mL screw-cap tube
PLACE samples on a rotary mixer and mix at 25rpm,0h 0m 0s
, at Room temperature
CENTRIFUGE at 13.000rpm,0h 0m 0s
for 0h 3m 0s
PURIFY the DNA using the MinElute Kit (Qiagen) as per the manufacturer's instructions
BIND DNA using the kit's spin column
ELUTE the DNA in 80µL
of Buffer EB
Method 4: EDTA + bead-beating + liquid silica in QG Buffer (“Combined”, or “Com”)
INCUBATE 0.25g
of three frozen sediment subsamples in EDTA overnight as in step 3.1 of the above section "EDTA + MinElute (“EDTA”)" , EXCEPT use only 0.75mL
to keep volumes consistent with a subsequent step (below)
CENTRIFUGE at 13.000rpm,0h 0m 0s
for 0h 3m 0s
KEEP supernatant at 4°C
PROCESS pellet separately using bead-beating and DNA purification, as in Method 2 (above)
RECOMBINE the resulting 0.75mL
DNA-solution purified from the pellet (step 10 of DNeasy Kit protocol) with 0.75mL
EDTA supernatant to make 1.5mL
total
ADD 6mL
modified QG buffer with 100µL
liquid silica
PROCEED as described in Method 2 (above)
ELUTE the DNA in 100µL
Buffer EB